The Federal Government of Somalia has issued an official response to a press statement released on November 12 by United Nations experts, who expressed concern regarding the state of the judiciary in the country—specifically the removal of the former Chief Justice and the controversy surrounding certain court rulings.
In a statement, the Ministry of Justice and Constitutional Affairs indicated that the government has taken the concerns raised by the UN experts seriously, while reaffirming its commitment to upholding judicial independence, the rule of law, and the Constitution.
The government expressed regret that the experts did not seek clarification or evidence from the authorities regarding the issues of concern before issuing their statement. It further noted that while Somalia’s Permanent Mission to the United Nations in Geneva received a request from the experts, the specific list of issues intended for discussion was not provided. Meanwhile, the government stated that Somalia is currently in a constitutional transition phase. It noted that the new system established under the 2026 Constitution has not yet fully realized all the institutions it envisions—including the Supreme Judicial Council.
The statement clarified that the removal of the former Chief Justice on November 4, 2026, was carried out through an interim process—one which the government asserts followed the established procedures for such actions—and that this decision was unrelated to the constitutional case then being heard by the Supreme Court.
The Ministry of Justice further asserted that any statements or rulings issued by the former Chief Justice following his removal cannot be recognized as valid legal decisions of the Supreme Court, as he no longer held the position of Chief Justice at that time.
Additionally, the government indicated that the Office of the Prosecutor General has submitted legal objections to the court regarding its jurisdiction over the case and the standing of the plaintiff, arguing that these procedural steps are essential for ensuring justice and upholding the integrity of the judicial system.
Finally, the Somali government stated that the decisions issued by the former chairman are not in accordance with the law and, therefore, have no legal effect. It clarified that it intends to address this matter through legal and institutional measures, while ensuring that no pressure is exerted on judges and that there is no interference in the work of the judiciary.
The government affirmed its continued readiness for dialogue and its willingness to provide further details to United Nations experts. It also called for discussions among political stakeholders and government institutions to safeguard stability, uphold the rule of law, and advance the development of the nation’s institutions.